|
|
|
| Forum Comments, Suggestions, and Bugs Post forum related Comments, Suggestions, and Bugs here |
|
View Poll Results: Should there be a U.S. Army Paintball forum?
|
|
Yes
|
 
|
3 |
12.50% |
|
No
|
 
|
21 |
87.50% |
 |
|

01-19-2010, 08:47 PM
|
 |
Strike Force Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Age: 24
Posts: 145
Rep Power: 26
|
|
|
At this point there's hardly enough activity on the 98OG alone. Dividing that into the 98OG and ARMYOG would not only be a pointless split, but it would be fiscially irresponsible, as we would go from 1 forum that (I'm guessing) barely holds its head above water and doubling the operating cost.
I could kind of see the merit; but before I'd ever vote for it, I'd want to see a Phenom OG (since it actually has diferent internals; though I'd still vote against that one today); an ION or SP-OG (I'd actually like that one since I know there are a number of us who have IONs or other SP markers); or even something more eclectic like a MacDevOG AngelOG or AutoCockerOG (none of which I expect to see, unless Buck creates an ACOG himself!)
|

01-20-2010, 12:07 PM
|
 |
Strike Force Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Iowa
Posts: 219
Rep Power: 31
|
|
|
Besides the fact that they are the same marker I think using the forum name US Army OG would probably not go over to well with alot of people as it gives off a different impression than that of a paintball forum.
Also why create another forum to a marker with a different body, that would be like creating a PEOG every year since they come out with a marker every year, I just dont see the point.
|

01-20-2010, 12:47 PM
|
 |
Just a love machine......
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Ridgeway, VA
Posts: 176
Rep Power: 17
|
|
|
I voted nay. I'm in agreement with most everyone else about the reasons not to go forward with it.
|

01-21-2010, 01:48 PM
|
 |
Team Devil Ops XO
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: St Pete, FL
Age: 36
Posts: 57
Rep Power: 15
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rev. Bruce
At this point there's hardly enough activity on the 98OG alone. Dividing that into the 98OG and ARMYOG would not only be a pointless split, but it would be fiscially irresponsible, as we would go from 1 forum that (I'm guessing) barely holds its head above water and doubling the operating cost.
I could kind of see the merit; but before I'd ever vote for it, I'd want to see a Phenom OG (since it actually has diferent internals; though I'd still vote against that one today); an ION or SP-OG (I'd actually like that one since I know there are a number of us who have IONs or other SP markers); or even something more eclectic like a MacDevOG AngelOG or AutoCockerOG (none of which I expect to see, unless Buck creates an ACOG himself!)
|
That's a good point there. I check all of the Tippmann related OG's daily, more than that on boring days at work. There is hardly any traffic to the 98OG as is. The A5OG & X7OG have a lot more traffic.
At most I would say give it it's own subsection, like they did in the X7OG for the Phenom.
__________________
Team Devil Ops XO
|

02-20-2010, 04:34 AM
|
 |
Look, Cleaver distraction
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Age: 34
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 19
|
|
|
I had to vote no myself...as it has already been pointed out...it's just a 98 with a newer body. It would be adding more work un-needed work on the mods.
A sub forum within the 98OG...sure....I can see that being a little more piratical.
|
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:22 AM.
|